From the category archives:

Uncategorized

March Hospitalist Schedule

by admin on March 2, 2010

BMHGT Hospitalist Schedule March 2010.pdf

{ 0 comments }

CHF Orders

by admin on December 4, 2009

CHF Orders.pdf   

CHF Orders Correction
**NOTICE**  This order set contains an incorrect dose for DVT prophylaxis Lovenox, corrected set forthcoming.  The incorrect dose is in the DVT prophylaxis Lovenox dosing for Cr Cl < 30 – it should read Lovenox 30mg q 24 instead of Lovenox 30mg q 12.  The correct dosing for Cr Cl < 30 is Lovenox 30mg q 24.

{ 0 comments }

Stroke TPA Orders

by admin on November 9, 2009

Stroke TPA Orders.pdf 11-09

These orders placed on the Emergency, Medicine, Neurology and Hospitalist pages.

Nov 09 updated ACAP orders placed on Emergency, Medicine, Pulmonary and Hospitalists pages.

{ 0 comments }

BMHGT.com News

by admin on October 28, 2009

These orders moved to the Orthopedics page 10-29-09

Ortho Post Op Orders.pdf

Ortho Surgery Admission Orders.pdf

{ 0 comments }

BMHGT.com News

by admin on October 28, 2009

These orders moved to the Hospitalist page 10-29-09.

Ischemic Stroke Admission Orders.pdf

Ischemic Stroke Post TPA Orders.pdf

{ 0 comments }

Unsustainable?

by admin on October 15, 2009

From Medscape Internal Medicine

Solving the “Unsustainable” Physician-Pay Problem: Perspectives From the ACP, ACS, and ACC

Robert L. Lowes

Much of organized medicine applauds a healthcare reform bill in Congress that defuses a Medicare time bomb next year — namely, an overall 21.5% pay cut.

But can that legislation defuse an even bigger time bomb: the growth in Medicare and Medicaid spending that threatens to put the federal budget “on an unsustainable path,” according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO)?

The bill’s provisions to scrap the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula in Medicare that triggered the pay cut would seem to expand the federal deficit, not shrink it. However, the bill also funds experiments to pay physicians on the basis of quality and cost-effectiveness and to wean them from the more expensive fee-for-service model, which motivates physicians to pump up the volume of services rendered. In the words of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MEDPAC), this piecemeal approach “has created a rate of volume growth that is unsustainable.”

Supporters of the legislation acknowledge the need to pull the plug on the traditional fee-for-service model. “We believe in moving to a model that gives doctors a financial incentive to provide good care — it’s quality, not quantity,” said internist Joseph Stubbs, MD, of Albany, Georgia., president of the American College of Physicians (ACP) and one of several leaders in organized medicine that Medscape Medical News interviewed on healthcare reform and physician compensation.

HR 3200 Eliminates “Flawed” SGR Formula

Read More at Medscape….

{ 0 comments }

Diabetes Management Bundle

by admin on September 18, 2009

Diabetes Management Bundle.pdf

{ 0 comments }

“Pay for On Call” Issues

by admin on July 23, 2009

Recent AMA News article

HHS OIG Advisory Opinion on the issue

I want to go off call

American College of Emergency Physicians paper

{ 0 comments }

Quality Care Dangerous?

by admin on April 10, 2009

The April 8th Wall Street Journal contained an interesting editorial on the utility of  “quality metrics”  in health care entitled ‘Why Quality Care is Dangerous’.

The Obama administration is working with Congress to mandate that all Medicare payments be tied to “quality metrics.” But an analysis of this drive for better health care reveals a fundamental flaw in how quality is defined and metrics applied. In too many cases, the quality measures have been hastily adopted, only to be proven wrong and even potentially dangerous to patients.

Health-policy planners define quality as clinical practice that conforms to consensus guidelines written by experts. The guidelines present specific metrics for physicians to meet, thus “quality metrics.” Since 2003, the federal government has piloted Medicare projects at more than 260 hospitals to reward physicians and institutions that meet quality metrics. The program is called “pay-for-performance.” Many private insurers are following suit with similar incentive programs.

Continue with article on the WSJ site …

{ 0 comments }

January 28, 2009 Interesting Case Conf

by admin on January 19, 2009

January 28, 2009 Interesting Case Conference Noon Conf Center

To view the Slide Sets, click the links below.

50yo with jaundice
16yo with lymphadenopathy
Pulmonary Hypertension

{ 0 comments }

" " Copyrite BMHGT.com